08 December 19, 08:24
I recently installed a paid antivirus, after many hours dealing with the impossibility of copying an autorun.inf (harmless) file to an external disk I discovered that the antivirus was to blame, uninstalled the antivirus, end of the problem.
Each paid antivirus has its different problems, others work badly with Adguard etc ...
my question is:
from the point of view of security is a payment antivirus really necessary?
Windows defender currently seems to have a high level of protection by matching its results with the best, according to independent laboratories that test antivirus.
It is integrated into the system and although it does not have certain superfluous characteristics that others do have, it seems to be a good option from the exclusive point of view of security.
What do you think?
If I don't need cleaners, updaters, parental controls etc.
Is Windows defender the best option?
Each paid antivirus has its different problems, others work badly with Adguard etc ...
my question is:
from the point of view of security is a payment antivirus really necessary?
Windows defender currently seems to have a high level of protection by matching its results with the best, according to independent laboratories that test antivirus.
It is integrated into the system and although it does not have certain superfluous characteristics that others do have, it seems to be a good option from the exclusive point of view of security.
What do you think?
If I don't need cleaners, updaters, parental controls etc.
Is Windows defender the best option?
![[-]](https://www.geeks.fyi/images/collapse.png)
