Intel SSD 660p 2TB Review: a QLC Bargain (Update)
#1
Lightbulb 
Quote:
[Image: NpQwDrkPApjquTDNQuSUw-1200-80.jpg]

Quote:Our Verdict

Like other capacities of the drive, the 2TB Intel SSD 660p lacks high endurance, and direct to QLC write speed is lackluster. But you get solid performance and efficiency under consumer-based workloads. Top things off, it’s significantly cheaper than the competition and often goes on sale, making it one of the best SSD values available.

For

High-capacity M.2 2280 NVMe SSD
High-capacity
Competitive consumer performance
Low price point
Power-efficient
Software package

Against

Slow native write performance
Relatively low endurance

12/6/2019 Update: We've updated this article with new testing for the 2TB 660p, as well as tweaked parts of the review to reflect current pricing.

When the Intel SSD 660p NVMe launched in summer 2018, it marked the arrival of the first consumer drive with QLC (quad-level cell) flash. Since then, the technology has appeared in a number of other SSDs as storage prices have dropped like a rock. At the same time, the Intel SSD 660p has become one of the best bargains in tech. With near-constant sales, you can often find the 660p selling for as little as $80 (£80) for a 1TB drive, though the 2TB models often go on sale for under $200 (£152).

One of the best SSDs you can get due to its mix of price and performance, the SSD 660p communicates over a fast PCIe 3.0 x4 and delivers up to 1.8 GB/s of throughput. It also offers surprisingly good performance in random workloads. If that wasn’t enough, the 660P comes with a five-year warranty.

We put the Intel SSD 660p 1TB capacity to the test and found that it offers a surprising amount of performance given its low price point. If your workload trends towards mundane daily tasks, like content consumption, office work, and web browsing, the 660p is a great solution with plenty of performance and endurance for most users. That said, if you like this SSD but wish it had more endurance, keep an eye out for the 660p's recently announced successor, the Intel SSD 665p, which promises slightly faster performance, and a 50% rated endurance bump.

While QLC sounds too good to be true, it’s not. Intel has a strong track record for developing new and innovative storage technology. The company was the first to bring NVMe SSDs to market four years ago with the Intel SSD 750 series, and it also developed the exotic 3D XPoint memory that it uses in the Optane products.

ntel’s 64-layer 3D QLC flash technology dramatically boosts flash storage capacity. MLC flash stores two bits per cell and TLC flash stores three, but QLC crams four bits into each cell. The 33% increase in density ultimately equates to more storage capacity for less money. Intel's QLC flash enables up to one 1-terabit (125GB) of storage capacity in a single die. SSD vendors can pack up to 16 die into a single package, which means QLC enables up to 2TB per package.

Just like Intel's other flash technology, QLC flash leverages the tried-and-true vertical floating gate flash cell design. Competing flash from other foundries use charge trap designs.

High-capacity and inexpensive flash is music to everyone’s ears, but QLC has an Achilles heel. Well, two. QLC NAND has lower write performance and less endurance than MLC or TLC flash because it stores 16 different charge levels per cell to represent four bits of data. Due to the physical characteristics of flash, it's a challenge to store and modify 16 charge levels at the nanometer scale, especially as the flash ages. Cell-to-cell interference complicates the task. Intel claims the 3D floating gate design helps isolate the cells to reduce interference. In either case, sophisticated error correction algorithms, such as LDPC, are a key ingredient to boosting endurance.

Intel sidesteps many of the performance challenges associated with QLC flash by tweaking the firmware and using intelligent idle time performance adjustments. Intel's Intelligent Dynamic SLC-Caching, which uses a pool of fast SLC flash to boost performance for incoming write data, takes a two-step approach.

First, the 660p has a static SLC cache that is 6GB, 12GB, or 24GB, depending upon SSD capacity. The static cache capacity never changes, but the SSD has a larger dynamic SLC cache pool that boosts performance further. The dynamic cache capacity adjusts bi-directionally based upon the amount of data stored on the SSD. In other words, the cache shrinks as you fill up the drive but expands as you delete items. Higher-capacity 660p's have larger dynamic SLC caches, as outlined in the chart above.

The SLC pool flushes to the QLC flash during idle periods, but Intel has a new on-demand performance boost option if you need your SLC performance back right away after bombarding the drive with writes. The feature allows you to flush the SLC cache to the QLC flash manually. Intel added this feature to its SSD optimizer in SSD Toolbox version 3.5.3.
...
Continue Reading
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Welcome
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username/Email:


Password:





[-]
Recent Posts
GFYI [Official] O&O Software Father's D...
"Share feedback...jAcos — 06:02
GFYI [Official] Ashampoo Snap v17 Fathe...
"Share feedback...jAcos — 06:01
GFYI [Official] Revo Registry Cleaner P...
I want win Pro versi...jAcos — 05:57
Revo Registry Cleaner
Revo Registry Cleane...jasonX — 14:46
Kaspersky\VPN\KSOS 21.22 & KES 12.10 be...
harlan4096 — 07:42

[-]
Birthdays
Today's Birthdays
avatar (38)biobdam
Upcoming Birthdays
avatar (38)Tedscolo
avatar (45)brakasig
avatar (39)storoBox
avatar (47)kinotHeemn
avatar (38)Ceballos1976
avatar (39)efynu

[-]
Online Staff
harlan4096's profile harlan4096
Administrator

>